## The Data Lifecycle 1. **Raw Submission**: Users submit their individual opinions or viewpoints on an issue, stored off-chain on IPFS. 2. **Processing**: These submissions are analyzed and refined—possibly by AI—to merge similar ideas, remove duplicates, and weight them by public opinion. 3. **Refined Output**: The processed data yields key themes or popular ideas derived from the submissions. 4. **Community Validation**: The community evaluates and votes on these outputs to determine which ones best represent the collective view. 5. **Accepted Input**: Validated outputs are accepted as meaningful contributions to the final result. 6. **Final Result**: The contributions are compiled into an actionable outcome that informs legislation or decision-making. --- ## Glossary of Terminology - **Perspective** *Definition*: The raw, unprocessed submission of a user’s opinion or viewpoint on a specific issue or piece of legislation, stored off-chain (on IPFS). - **Synthesis** *Definition*: The analytical process, often AI-driven, that refines and combines multiple perspectives into coherent insights. This involves merging similar ideas, removing duplicates, and weighting perspectives based on public opinion or voting. - **Insight** *Definition*: A refined and aggregated summary derived from one or more perspectives, representing common themes, popular ideas, or key takeaways that emerge from the synthesis process. - **Consensus** *Definition*: The community’s collective evaluation, voting, or endorsement of specific insights, determining which ones are most valuable, accurate, or representative of public opinion. - **Contribution** *Definition*: An insight that has been validated through consensus and accepted by the community as a meaningful input for the final decision-making process. Contributions are the building blocks of the project’s output. - **Resolution** *Definition*: The conclusive result or output, derived from the contributions, that is used to inform legislation, policy, or other decision-making processes. This is the final, actionable outcome of the project. --- ## How It All Fits Together 1. **Perspective**: A user submits their raw opinion on a proposed law (e.g., "I think taxes should fund more public parks"), stored on IPFS. 2. **Synthesis**: AI analyzes hundreds of perspectives, merging similar ones (e.g., park funding ideas), removing duplicates, and weighting them by frequency of mentions, producing insights. 3. **Insight**: An insight emerges (e.g., "Most users support increased park funding as a tax priority"). 4. **Consensus**: The community votes, agreeing that this insight reflects the public’s view. 5. **Contribution**: The validated insight becomes a contribution, accepted as a key input. 6. **Resolution**: Contributions are compiled into a resolution (e.g., "Recommend tax allocation for parks"), sent to policymakers.