numenor-labs/discourse
2
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
discourse/discovery/initial/PLAN.md
Justin Carper 66f170a21d ui prototyping
2025-03-24 16:25:03 -04:00

7.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Architecture Overview

The system’s architecture is modular, allowing each component to be developed and scaled independently while integrating seamlessly. Here’s how it’s structured:

1. Blockchain Layer

  • Purpose: Stores feedback, legislative drafts, edits, and verification data immutably.
  • Technology:
    • Hyperledger Fabric (permissioned blockchain) for controlled access and scalability.
    • Smart contracts to automate feedback submission, edit tracking, and access control.
  • Key Features:
    • Channels for privacy (e.g., separating feedback from edits).
    • Off-chain storage for large data (e.g., feedback text), with hashes on-chain for integrity.

2. AI Layer

  • Purpose: Analyzes feedback, categorizes it, identifies consensus, and generates legislative text.
  • Technology:
    • Python with NLP libraries (e.g., Hugging Face’s Transformers), clustering (e.g., scikit-learn), and text generation (e.g., GPT-4).
    • Containerized microservices (Docker) for scalability.
  • Key Features:
    • Models fine-tuned on legislative and public policy data.
    • Privacy-preserving options like federated learning if needed.

3. ZKP Layer

  • Purpose: Enables privacy-preserving feedback submission and identity verification.
  • Technology:
    • zk-SNARKs using circom for circuit design and snarkjs for proof generation.
    • Go (gnark library) for verification.
  • Key Features:
    • Simplified ZKP generation for users (client-side library).
    • Lightweight proofs for fast verification.

4. Collaboration Layer

  • Purpose: Provides a git-like interface for editing legislation collaboratively.
  • Technology:
    • Go for backend logic with go-git for version control.
    • JavaScript/TypeScript for frontend interaction.
  • Key Features:
    • Intuitive interface hiding git complexity for non-technical users.
    • Change history stored on the blockchain for transparency.

5. Frontend Layer

  • Purpose: Offers a user-friendly interface for feedback submission, editing, and tracking.
  • Technology:
    • Next.js for a secure, functional UI.
    • JavaScript for cryptographic tasks (e.g., ZKP generation).
  • Key Features:
    • Accessible design (WCAG-compliant).
    • Secure communication with the backend via gRPC-Web or a proxy.

6. Integration Layer

  • Purpose: Connects with existing government systems for interoperability (Enhancement 7).
  • Technology:
    • REST or gRPC APIs for data exchange.
    • Middleware for data transformation (e.g., ETL tools).
  • Key Features:
    • Compatibility with common government databases (e.g., SQL, NoSQL).
    • Secure authentication (e.g., OAuth2).

Development Plan

We’ll use a phased, iterative approach to build the system, ensuring each component is functional and refined before advancing.

Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (3-6 months)

  • Objective: Establish the blockchain, basic feedback system, and AI analysis.
  • Tasks:
    1. Deploy Hyperledger Fabric network.
    2. Implement chaincode for feedback submission with simulated ZKPs (e.g., token-based).
    3. Build an AI microservice for feedback categorization and text generation.
    4. Create a basic Next.js frontend for feedback submission.
  • Success Metrics:
    • Blockchain stores test feedback.
    • AI accurately categorizes and generates text from sample data.

Phase 2: Privacy and Collaboration (4-7 months)

  • Objective: Add real ZKPs and the git-like collaboration interface.
  • Tasks:
    1. Replace simulated ZKPs with zk-SNARKs for anonymous feedback submission.
    2. Develop the collaboration backend using go-git.
    3. Integrate AI-generated text into the collaboration platform.
    4. Enhance the frontend for editing and version tracking.
  • Success Metrics:
    • Users can submit feedback anonymously with ZKPs.
    • Collaborative editing functions with transparent change tracking.

Phase 3: Enhancements(6-12 months)

  • Objective: Implement enhancements to enrich functionality.
  • Tasks:
    1. Liquid Democracy: Add vote delegation via smart contracts.
    2. Real-Time Tracking (Enhancement 2): Enable live legislative updates with blockchain queries.
    3. AI Consensus Tools (Enhancement 3): Develop features to identify consensus in feedback.
    4. Privacy-Preserving Identity (Enhancement 4): Use ZKPs for secure ID verification.
    5. Modular Legislation (Enhancement 5): Enforce modularity with smart contract templates.
    6. Incentivized Participation (Enhancement 6): Introduce tokens or rewards for engagement.
    7. Interoperability (Enhancement 7): Build APIs to connect with external systems.
    8. Educational Tools (Enhancement 8): Create tutorials and in-app guides.
  • Success Metrics:
    • Users can delegate votes and track changes in real-time.
    • AI highlights consensus areas.
    • System integrates with at least one external government database.

Phase 4: Polish and Scale (3-6 months)

  • Objective: Optimize performance, ensure security, and prepare for launch.
  • Tasks:
    1. Optimize blockchain and AI for large-scale use.
    2. Conduct security audits and penetration testing.
    3. Launch educational campaigns and onboarding materials.
  • Success Metrics:
    • System supports 10,000+ concurrent users.
    • Passes a third-party security audit.
    • Educational tools boost user engagement by 20%.

Strategies to Ensure Success

To make this platform a success, focus on these critical areas:

1. User-Centric Design

  • Why: Accessibility for non-technical users is vital.
  • How:
    • Conduct user testing with diverse groups (e.g., varying ages, tech skills).
    • Simplify interfaces based on feedback, prioritizing ease of use.

2. Security and Privacy

  • Why: Trust is essential for a legislative platform.
  • How:
    • Use end-to-end encryption for sensitive data.
    • Perform regular security audits and offer bug bounties.
    • Clearly communicate privacy features to users.

3. Scalability

  • Why: The system must handle millions of users and feedback entries.
  • How:
    • Implement blockchain sharding or layer-2 solutions.
    • Optimize AI models for speed (e.g., model distillation).
    • Use cloud autoscaling for frontend and backend.

4. Interoperability

  • Why: Integration with existing systems drives adoption.
  • How:
    • Develop REST and gRPC APIs early.
    • Test with mock government databases.
    • Use standard data formats (e.g., JSON-LD).

5. Community Building

  • Why: A strong user base fuels growth and improvement.
  • How:
    • Open-source key components to encourage contributions.
    • Offer incentives for early adopters (e.g., tokens, badges).
    • Maintain active forums and support channels.

6. Legal Compliance

  • Why: Regulatory adherence is crucial.
  • How:
    • Consult legal experts on data protection and election laws.
    • Ensure compliance with GDPR, CCPA, etc.
    • Advocate for supportive digital governance policies.

7. Educational Outreach

  • Why: Users need to understand the system to trust it.
  • How:
    • Provide in-app tutorials, FAQs, and AI chatbots.
    • Partner with civic education groups.
    • Launch public awareness campaigns.

Additional Tips for Success

  • Start Small: Pilot the system in a tech-savvy region (e.g., California or Austin) to refine it.
  • Collaborate: Partner with civic tech organizations (e.g., Code for America) for expertise and credibility.
  • Focus on Impact: Launch with a resonant issue (e.g., climate policy) to gain traction.
  • Stay Transparent: Form a public oversight board to maintain accountability.
  • Iterate Continuously: Use agile methods to adapt based on user feedback and tech advancements.